PELINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DATA PRIBADI ANUMERTA
Abstract
Saat ini, seseorang yang telah meninggal dunia tidak sepenuhnya dapat meninggalkan kehidupannya, karena serpihan jejak datanya senantiasa hidup sepeninggalannya. Penggunaan tidak sah oleh orang lain, ataupun upaya mengelola data anumerta oleh ahli waris menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi penstudi hukum yang penting untuk segera diatasi. Tulisan ini mempertanyakan alasan seseorang memiliki pelindungan untuk data pribadinya semasa hidup, namun tidak berlanjut setelah meninggal dunia. Terbatasnya pelindungan data pribadi orang yang telah meninggal akan melahirkan potensi pelanggaran martabat hingga privasi dari subjek data, sehingga diharapkan adanya perluasan pelindungan data pribadi anumerta. Konsep post-mortem privacy protection yang telah diterapkan oleh berbagai negara dalam ragam bentuk serta aturannya dapat dijadikan alternatif solusi guna meminimalisir potensi permasalahan akibat penggunaan data anumerta di kemudian hari. Terdapat beberapa tawaran konsep yang nantinya dapat dipertimbangkan untuk diadopsi dalam mengembangkan arsitektur hukum siber di Indonesia, baik dalam tingkat konstitusi, perubahan Undang-Undang Pelindungan Data Pribadi hingga perluasan konsep regulasi lainnya yang terkait seperti halnya Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen.Kata kunci: Anumerta; Privasi; Data Pribadi; Hukum Siber.
References
Ashley, K. C. (2020). Data of the Dead: A Proposal for Protecting Posthumous Data Data of the Dead: A Proposal for Protecting Posthumous Data Privacy Privacy. William & Mary Law Review, 2(62), 649–682. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/
Bak, M. A. R., & Willems, D. L. (2022). Contextual Exceptionalism After Death: An Information Ethics Approach to Post-Mortem Privacy in Health Data Research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(4). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00387-0
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Chaparro-Domínguez, M. Á. (2020). From Youthful Experimentation to Professional Identity: Understanding Identity Transitions in Social Media. Young, 28(2), 157–174. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308819834386
Daffa Syahrizal, M. (2023). Pembaharuan Hukum terhadap Pasal 180 KUHP Mengenai Kejahatan terhadap Jenazah. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 11(7), 1718–1735. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i07.p20
Davey, T. (2020). Until Death Do Us Part: Post-mortem Privacy Rights for the Ante-mortem Person. University of East Anglia, Norwich.
De Baets, A. (2016). A historian’s view on the right to be forgotten. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 30(1–2), 57–66. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2015.1125155
De, I., Beriain, M., Duardo Sánchez, A., & Castillo Parrilla, J. (2021). What Can We Do with the Data of Deceased People? A Normative Proposal. European Review of Private Law.
de Terwangne, C. (2021). Council of Europe convention 108+: A modernised international treaty for the protection of personal data. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105497. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105497
De Vries, N. (2022). ‘Porsche Girl’: When a Dead Body Becomes a Meme Learning Objectives. MIT Case Studies in Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Computing, (Summer 2022), 1–17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21428/2c646de5.52d264e2
Di Minin, E., Fink, C., Hausmann, A., Kremer, J., & Kulkarni, R. (2021). How to address data privacy concerns when using social media data in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 35(2), 437–446. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13708
Gauthier Chassang. (2021). What About Post-Mortem Digital Privacy and Personal Health Data Protection ? In Deep diving into data protection : 1979-2019 : celebrating 40 years of research on privacy and data
protection at the CRIDS (pp. 433–460). Editions Larcier.
Harbinja, E. (2017). Post-mortem privacy 2.0: theory, law, and technology. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 31(1), 26–42. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2017.1275116
Harbinja, E., & Pearce, H. (2020). Your data will never die, but you will: A comparative analysis of US and UK post-mortem data donation frameworks. Computer Law and Security Review, 36. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105403
Harbinja, Edina. (2023). Digital death, digital assets and post-mortem privacy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Holt, J., Smeddinck, J. D., Nicholson, J., Vlachokyriakos, V., & Durrant, A. C. (2024). Post-mortem information management: exploring contextual factors in appropriate personal data access after death. Human-Computer Interaction. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2023.2300792
Kohl, U. (2022). What post-mortem privacy may teach us about privacy. Computer Law and Security Review, 47. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105737
Lilian Edwards, & Edina Harbinja. (2013). Protecting Post-Mortem Privacy: Reconsidering the Privacy Interests of the Deceased in a Digital World. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 32, 101–147. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/nov/17/inside-
Morse, T., & Birnhack, M. (2022). The posthumous privacy paradox: Privacy preferences and behavior regarding digital remains. New Media and Society, 24(6), 1343–1362. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820974955
Noval, S. M. R. (2024). Hukum Siber: Kebangkitan Kembali Metaverse Beserta Permasalahan Hukumnya. Bandung: Rajawali Pers.
Noval, S. M. R. (2019). The Challenge of Indonesia in Applying the Right to be Forgotten. International Journal of Crime, Law and Social Issues, 2(5), 39–49. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3318105
Okoro, E. L. (2018). Death and Personal Data in the Age of Social Media. Tilburg University, Tilburg.
Pearce, H. (2022). Our data? An examination of the possible role of individual consent in the regulation of posthumous medical data donation (PMDD). Computer Law and Security Review, 45. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105663
Sappa, C., & Widła, B. (2023). Framing Texts and Images: Critical and Posthumous Editions in the Digital Single Market. IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54(9), 1359–1380. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01394-9
Schafer, B., Briggs, J., Moncur, W., Nicol, E., & Azzopardi, L. (2023). What the Dickens: Post-mortem privacy and intergenerational trust. Computer Law and Security Review, 49. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105800
Smolensky, K. R. (2009). Rights of the Dead. Hofstra Law Review, 37(3).
Stow, S. (2018). Defaming the Dead. By Don Herzog. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017. 288p. $40.00 cloth. Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 791–792. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592718001779
Zhao, B. (2014). Posthumous Reputation and Posthumous Privacy in China: The Dead, the Law, and Social Transition. Brooklyn
Journal of International Law, 39(1), 270–352. Retrieved from https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol39/iss1/5
Zudekoff, M. (2021). “A Private Affair”: A Look into Posthumous Privacy Rights after the Rise of Digital Assets and Why There Must be a Federal Privacy Statute to Protect these Assets (No. 1130). Retrieved from New Jersey,: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/1130
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.