STAKEHOLDER INTERESTED ORIENTATION IN TRADITIONAL MARKET REVITALIZATION POLICIES IN SITUBONDO DISTRICT

Hasan Muchtar Fauzi, Usrotul Hasanah

Abstract


Regional Governments are given the authority to revitalize traditional markets in accordance with the needs in order to be competitive and improve the welfare of traders. However, the programmed revitalization did not run optimally, due to differences in the orientation of the interests of stakeholders who were not properly organized, causing dissatisfaction with certain groups. The research objective is to describe the orientation of stakeholders in the involvement of traditional market revitalization policies in Situbondo Regency. The method used is descriptive qualitative phenomenological approach. Research locus of Sumberkolak market, Panarukan market and Besuki market. The research analysis unit for stakeholders with an interest in traditional market revitalization policies is, first, Inside Local Government; DPRD, Diskoperindag, Executive, UPTD, DPKD. Second, Inside Local Government Participant; Bappeda, DTKP, DLHK, BPS, Private. Third, Outside Local Government; Traders, Cultural Leaders, NGOs. Fourth, Outside Local Government Participant; Traditional market consumers, Society. The research findings show that there are three dominant interests, (1), traders are oriented towards increasing income, (2), local government is oriented towards increasing PAD, (3), cultural figures are oriented towards religious cultural values ​​that are integrated into activities in the market . From this orientation of interests, market traders are neglected, giving rise to dissatisfaction pros and cons that are considered not to be on their side. It is necessary to involve all stakeholders who have a direct interest in revitalization without ignoring the interests of one group, so that the policies implemented are fair

References


Bungin. B. 2012. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Crosby, B.L. 1992. Stakeholder Analysis: A vital tool for strategic managers. Technical Notes, No. 2. Agency for International Development, Washington DC.

Dwiyanto,A.2004.Reorientasi Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Dari Government ke Governance. Di sampaikan dalam acara pengukuhan guru besar Prof. Dr Agus Dwiyanto, MPA pada tanggal 21 agustus

Estu Suryowati. 2017. Berapa pasar tradisional yang sudah dibenahi pemerintah pada 2016?. Downloaded December.2017. https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read /2017/01/05/074400126/ beberapa.pasar.tradisionl

Gonzalez, S and P. Waley. 2013. Traditional Retail Markets: The New Gentrification Frontier? Antipode: a radical journal of geography, 45

(4). 965 - 983. ISSN 0066-4812.

Gonzalez, S and Waley, P. (2013). Traditional Retail Markets: The New Gentrification Frontier? Antipode: a radical journal of geography, 45 (4). 965 - 983. ISSN 0066-4812.

Hetifah, S.J Sumarto. (2003) Inovasi, Partisipasi dan Good Governance : 20 Prakarsa Inovatif dan Partisipatif Di Indonesia. Jakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia Kementrian Perdagangan. 2016. Konsep Revitalisasi Pasar Rakyat. ttps://ews.kemendag.go.id/revitalisasi/KonsepRevitalisasi.aspx

Iqbal, Muhammad. 2007. “Analisis Pemangku Kepentingan dan Implementasinya dalam Pembangunan Pertanian”. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, Vol. 26 (3), pp 89-99.

Kementrian Perdagangan.2016. Konsep Revitalisasi Pasar Rakyat. https://ews.kemendag.go.id/revitalisasi/KonsepRevitalisasi.aspx

Nugroho, Hermawan Cahyo; Soesilo Zauhar; dan Suryadi. (2014) Koordinasi Pelaksanaan Program Pengembangan Kawasan Agropolitan di Kabupaten Nganjuk. Jurnal J-PAL, 5(1) : 12-22.

Miles, Mattew B dan Amichael Huberman. 2007. Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohisi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Miles, Metthew B,A. Michael Huberman and Johnny Saldana. (2014). Qualitative data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Sage Publications, Inc.

Peraturan Presiden. 2007. No.112. Penataan dan Pembinaan Pasar Tradisional Pusat Perbelanjaan dan Toko Modern. Jakarta: Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia.

Schwab, B. and D. Kubler. 2001. Metropolitan Governance and the ‘democratic

deficit: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Findings”, Paper in Conference

Area-based initiatives in contemporary urban policy, Copenhagen, May 2001,Available Online:

http://www.sbi.dk/eura/workshops/papers/workshop2/schwab.pdf

Scheemer, Kammi. (2000) Stakeholder Analysis Guidelines, Policy Toolkit for Strengthening Health Sector Reform. USA, LACHSR Health Sector Reform Intiative

Sugiyono. 2007. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by :

PUSKAP Prodi Administrasi Publik UPN "Veteran" Jawa Timur

in Collaboration with Indonesian Assosiation of Public Administration (IAPA)

 

Editorial Office :

Jl.Raya Rungkut Madya, Gunung Anyar, Surabaya

Telp : +6281908756400